Monday, February 6, 2017

Seeds of Revolution in France


Sketch The Swing by Fragonard (show pic of sketch) If this is a quintessential Rococo work, describe Rococo art. How does The Swing portray aristocratic subjects' light-hearted self-absorption, pursuit of pleasure, and disregard for ethical concerns? Discuss how and why middle class responses to prints of such works prompted Diderot's call for moral art.  
 

   At the beginning of the 1700s, and at the end of the reign of Louis XIV, there is a noticeable shift away from classicism and "Grand Manner" (based on the art of Poussin) that had governed the art in France, toward a new style of art called Rococo. This signifies a shift away from the monarchy and towards the aristocracy as seen as characterizations of the art of this period. The art subject during this period and the life style of the aristocracy are defined as leisure as a pursuit and became involved themselves in romantic intrigues. Indeed, they created a culture of luxury and excess that formed a stark contrast to the lives of most people in France.

   The swing portrays aristocratic subjects of light-hearted self-absorption, pursuit of pleasure, and disregard for ethical concerns. For example we see the light-hearted self-absorption in the way that the painting is specifically about the two lovers. Not anyone else, it’s all about their relationship. The background can be considered bland and uneventful for the eye and this helps keeps the painting all about them. The background doesn’t catch our eye or draw us in because we are caught up in what is happening between the lovers.

   This also portrays a pursuit of pleasure because this depicts a plan by the lady and the lover (the one not holding the ropes in the bottom left corner) to get the servant to swing the lady and then she can allow the lover to look up her skirt. He doesn’t want the servant to know this is happening so he is hiding in the bushes. This story illustrates that there is a pursuit of pleasure going on.

   This picture definitely reveals that there is an element of a disregard of ethics. During this time period it was extremely wrong for this type of behavior and actions to be carried on. That is one reason why they have to hide to carry out their scandalous acts.

    During this time period there was a decline of the aristocratic and a uprising of the middle class. This new rising social class had a set of morals that they believed strongly in. Also one reason for the fall of the aristocrats was a change in the way of thinking concerning politics and just the way of life. The commoner people wanted more control and were incited to climb out of their poverty and be a part of their own government. And so it was painting like this that philosophers of the Enlightenment condemned. They demanded a new style of art, one that showed an example of moral behavior, of human beings at their most noble. Really it was the Enlightment and the rise of middle class morals that drove these types of painting away.  

  

 

 

Tuesday, January 31, 2017

The Enlightenment and the Belief in Progress

Do you believe in Progress? Is the world getting better? Explain.

 
Progress is moving forward toward a destination. To ask a question about if I believe in Progress is a massive question that encompasses a lot of subjects. Progress in its broadest definition of moving forward toward a destination is someone I do uphold. We as intelligent humans are not meant to just stay stagnant in the present level of achievement, knowledge, or endeavors. We are definitely destined to keep pushing forward conquering and making this world a better place. This type of progress I most certainly believe in. Now there is an important question about what direction are we headed? One type of Progress that I certainly don’t believe in would be the current transcending social culture away from a religious oriented moralistic society. It pains me to see this “progress” that is carrying us away from Godly principles.

   Not all Progress is headed for destruction; I do believe that the world is getting gradually better as it is passed on to each new generation. When we examine what the past was like and how there was a lack of knowledge, medical care, technology, civil right, civil liberties, etc. that overall contributed to a harder life. With the progress we have made up to this moment and what we will continue to accomplish is exciting and comforting to know that the next generation will be able to inherit an earth that is better than the one we got.

Monday, January 23, 2017

Counter-Reformation Architecture

Sketch Il Gesu's plan. Compare it with the plans of Santa Sabina and St. Sernin. What are the reasons for the architectural differences?
  
   The Santa Sabina and the Church of Gesu are the same and different in many ways. For instance They are the same because they are both basilicas. They are different because the isles for the Santa Sabina are actual two long corridors, while the Church of Gesu has many small chapels that line the central nave. The Santa Sabina domes not have a dome while the Church of Gesu does have a dome at the very end supported by arched leaning pillars. Another difference would include the knowledge that the Santa Sabina has a mosaic at the very end where the alter is. On the other hand the Church of Gesu has a painted fresco and a bronze sculpture of the sun at the end. Also the Church of Gesu has painted fresco on the top of the ceiling that looks as if it is billowing out. On the other hand the Santa Sabina doesn’t have any of this. To conclude this comparison with a similarity, they both have windows that line the higher wall next to the nave which runs all the way down to the alter.  
   Now for the comparison between St. Sernin and the Church of Gesu. I will not mention all of the Church of Gesu’s architectural components because of the fact that I mentioned them in the latter paragraph. One of the main differences between the two churches is that St. Sernin is built in the shape of a cross while the Church of Gesu is just in a long basilica. Furthermore, St. Sernin has a very pointed and long steeple on top of their church while the other is just a rounded dome. Another difference would be the front outside façade. Here the St. Sernin has a blockish looking front that is pretty much plain with a giant circular window and two front doors. The Church of Gesu on the other hand is a two terred building with which looks like a second story. On this second story are two separate windows and center door that leads out unto a small balcony. On the ground there is a center big door with two smaller doors off to the sides spread evenly apart. Both have a bronze looking sculpture at the front of the church but the Church of Gesu has a circular sun beam and the other has an angel. St. Sernin has a ribbed vaulted ceiling while the other has a rounded ceiling.
   One reason for all these differences in the building architecture is the different architects that built them. This is significant because each of these builders is unique in their styles because of different influences in schooling and different creative minds. For example the Santa Sabina was built by Peter of Illyria, a Dalmatian priest in between 422 and 432. St. Sernin was constructed in the Romanesque style between about 1080 and 1120 so it definitely had to be by a different guy. The Church of Gesu was made by Giacomo Barozzi da Vignola and Giacomo della Porta and completed in 1580. And so all these different dates and different people prove that there was different cultural ideas floating around at each of their times on what made good architecture. Simply put, the reason for the differences is because of the different cultural times in which they lived.

Plans of the Church of Gesu

















Sunday, January 22, 2017

Portraits

 
   I don't know about it being one of the best pictures, but this is one of my senior pictures that I thought turned out pretty good. I think that this picture turned out pretty good because this was the first I ever took a picture showing my teeth. I've had braces for a while so I never really smiled showing my teeth and before that I was insecure about how my teeth looked. Ever since I got my braces off it has increased my confidence I now I smile with my teeth showing. Looking at this image makes me look like a vibrant confident youth. I personally love those colors and I think they look good on me.
 
   If I were to have my picture publicly then I would pose in a power position and have the shot capture my entire body and not just my torso up. I would be sure to be dressed up in a suit and maybe have an American flag and Texas flag in the background. The expression on my face would be one of joy and confidence. My hands would probably hold some important documents like a Bible and the United States Constitution. The type of setting that I would chose would be either the U.S. Capitol, White House, or take the picture up on the top of a mountain over looking the world. The objects that I would want near me would include our nation's governing documents like The Constitution or Declaration of Independence. I also would like to have anything that was very influential in making our dear country. I do have a picture that I took and would have put up on the website but it was granny. In the picture I am holding a Texas flag that flew over the Texas Capitol and I also have an American Flag that flew over the US Capitol. And so in this picture that would spread around publicly I would like to hold both the US and Texas flag. The question about "Who do you want to be?" is a loaded question. But to put it simply I want to be a person that goes down in history as someone who sought to reinforce our constitution and freedoms fought by many patriots before me and took actions to help out our nation for the better. And so when people look at this picture I want them to reminder of all the good things that I did. 

 
 
 

Friday, December 16, 2016

Museum Visted for Second Nine Weeks




Because there was no photography allowed and there was no brochure that had an extensive amount of photos in it there will be no pictures that I took of the artwork that I have chosen to talk about. But I did However did get to retrieve some images of his painting from His website

1st Artwork

Lunessence
Walt Davis
Watercolor on paper
30X22 in
2013
Lunessence by Walter Davis Watercolor ~ 30 inches x 22 inches

   Of course seeing this painting on a picture is nothing like going in to the museum to see it for yourself. By the way this painting is being sold for $975. When I first caught a glimpse of this painting out of the corner of my eye it actually caused my head to spin around to see it more clearly. This picture doesn't illuminate it, but the central moth is so brightly painted that the light is actually coming from the painting and causing the insects around it to also be shown. The moth is so bright that you can even see some of the light being thrown on top of the mosquito, and the part of the  mosquito's that isn't facing the light is in darkness.
   When I saw this painting I was overcome by its beauty and just fell in love with it. There is no story behind this painting but the painter, Walt Davis, did paint insects because he is a biologist that specializes in insects. So it is interesting how he took his career and love of painting and combined them together.


2nd Artwork

Katy-did, Katy didn't
Walt Davis
Watercolor on Paper
22X30 in
2013
Katy-did, Katy-didn't by Walter Davis Watercolor ~ 22 inches x 30 inches

   What is going on in this painting is a just a katydid with its legs curled up and the antennas waving away from the insect. Oh and this painting is also $975.
   What really interested me about his piece was the attention to the detail in the insect. I mean the barbs on the insects legs are carefully counted and attended to. The antennas on the insect display the obscure segments that connect the antae as a whole. Also the physical structure of the insect and how its body precisely looks like. When I view this image it's as also if we are looking under a microscope. Another thing that I noticed is the how the image was drawn. Most people have a horror to insect because they look so disgusting. But here that is not true. This insect is not disgusting but is also magnificent in its brightly painted fashion. It definitely presents the image to be viewed at a different perspective. And that is why I really liked this watercolor painting.
   This painting made me feel an openness to the idea that anything can have beauty. Even though people may view these bugs in real life as disgusting, we can still see them as beautiful. There is no story behind the painting as I stated in the other painting that the guy is a biologist.


Tuesday, December 6, 2016

Romanesque and Gothic Architecture

Pilgrimage Routes and the Cult of the Relic (NOTE: Read this before completing blog.) https://www.kha​nacademy.org/hu​manities/mediev​al-world/latin-​western-europe/​romanesque1/a/p​ilgrimage-route​s-and-the-cult-​of-the-relic
Blog: Describe a journey you have taken or would like to take to a place that is especially meaningful to you. Why is it meaningful?

A place that I would love to go that is especially meaningful to me is Ireland. This place is meaningful to me because my family from my grandfather back was born and raised in Ireland. My heritage comes from these lands and I would love to travel them. I would travel along the southern country of Ireland because this is where my family lived and died. Some of the places I would go include Cork, Kenmare, Dublin, and the Blarney Castle. The Blarney Castle is a particular spot I would like to go to because this is where my family ruled and even died in blood shed to maintain their power and territory. 

Virtual Tour

Five questions about the Virtual Tour.

What is the rank for this place as for most holiest site for Muslims?(EX:1,2,3,4,5)

Between AD 622 and AD 624 which direction did Muslims pray toward?

What do the doors of the mosque align with?

What is the Ablution fountain used for?

How many major world religions are represented in Jerusalem and at the Dome of the Rock?